threaded | unthreaded | newest first

W is for WOW

topic posted Sat, January 14, 2006 - 6:34 PM by  Unsubscribed
i thought 4 a sec that U booted me frm this tribe. i forget. what are the rules again?
posted by:
Unsubscribed
join to post

  • Re: W is for WOW

    Sat, January 14, 2006 - 8:13 PM
    the beauty of this tribe is that you make your own rules
    join to post
    • Unsu...
       

      Re: W is for WOW

      Sat, January 14, 2006 - 8:34 PM
      well i am happy for the freedom. we need more of this in life. don't you think?

      i am not kidding.

      only a few hundred years ago we all woulda been scratchin' our chiggers under the lean to.

      join to post
      • Unsu...
         

        X

        Sat, January 14, 2006 - 8:34 PM
        X is for xylophone
        join to post

        • Re: X

          Sat, January 14, 2006 - 9:04 PM
          Y is for Yo
          join to post

          • Re: X

            Sat, January 14, 2006 - 9:05 PM
            Z is for Zamfir, master of the pan flute
            join to post
            • Unsu...
               

              Re: Z

              Sat, January 14, 2006 - 9:11 PM
              i was thinking of zamfir today.

              i kid you not. but i will not share my feelings about these thoughts.--these ~impressions~ (so to speak). i do not want to sway anyone's opinion(s). in utopia we all feel about zamfir as we would wish.
              join to post
              • Unsu...
                 

                Re: B

                Sat, January 14, 2006 - 9:12 PM
                but this is not utopia

                and still even given the choice i don't know how to feel
                join to post

                • Re: B

                  Sat, January 14, 2006 - 9:30 PM
                  I'm neutral on the Zamfir issue.
                  join to post
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
                    Oran...
                    Orangeboxman
                    offline 142

                    Re: B

                    Sun, January 15, 2006 - 6:55 PM
                    There will be no resolution to the Zamfir issue until I see some tight-texted alphabetizing of high co-hit rate character strings.

                    zamfir
                    yugoslavia
                    xenophobia
                    wagnerian
                    virtuoso
                    underappreciated
                    tenderly
                    sonorous
                    roumanian
                    quivering
                    pan flute
                    overdubbed
                    novelty
                    morricone
                    leone
                    kitsch
                    jaw harp
                    ionian
                    hermes
                    greco-slavic
                    folk music
                    ennui
                    de-contextualized
                    categorical
                    billowing
                    aetherial
                    join to post

                    • Re: B

                      Mon, January 16, 2006 - 3:25 PM
                      There you go with the freakin rules again.
                      join to post
                      • Oran...
                        Orangeboxman
                        offline 142

                        Re: B

                        Thu, January 19, 2006 - 10:49 PM
                        Without rules, there's no driving principle behind this tribe.

                        I have enough other tribes without a driving principle.
                        join to post

                        • Re: B

                          Fri, January 20, 2006 - 6:20 PM
                          Why don't you tell us about your level of involvement with the "new look of tribe".
                          join to post
                          • Oran...
                            Orangeboxman
                            offline 142

                            Re: B

                            Thu, February 2, 2006 - 11:30 PM
                            That Tribe ever looked different is simply a myth.

                            So there's no 'new look' for me to be 'involved with', as you put it.

                            BTW: I'd like to know your reason for asking me such a question to begin with.
                            join to post