Advertisement
About seven years ago I got a small two word tattoo (fortunately NOT the name of a former lover) on the crest of my upper arm near my shoulder and I've regretted it a million times. Had I gotten the tattoo somewhere else on my body that didn't show in sleeveless clothing (I work in the financial management/services field in a very professional office) I probably would keep it but I've finally come to the point that I'd like it removed. I considered excision as its not all that big but that does leave a scar so my other option is laser removal. Have any of you had undergone the procedure or knew someone who has and might have some input for me? Thanks!
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Laser Removal?
Mon, June 1, 2009 - 9:11 AMWhat about getting it covered with something else? It's alot less painful than having it removed.
-
Re: Laser Removal?
Mon, June 1, 2009 - 9:19 AMI don't have first hand knowledge of laser removal. I know that it's quite expensive and from what I hear, is EXTREMELY painful. Most laser removal require several sessions over several weeks, depending on the size/colors of the piece being removed. I don't know much about excision, but the sound of it makes my skin crawl.
I know that you have job concerns but a coverup and/or three quarter sleeve blouses sound like the easiest way to go.
-
Re: Laser Removal?
Wed, June 17, 2009 - 4:06 PMyes, excision is an option, but a painful and scarring one usually. But quick. I had a poorly done flying horse on my upper shoulder, it was visible if I wore a top with no sleeves. So, laser it was. Very expensive. Quite painful. Very loud zapping sound. Depending on the depth of the tat and sometimes certain colours (except green-green is bad), you may have a great result like me and someone would only notice there was something there if you pointed the spot out exactly. Like a very minor bruise. There is an over-the-counter cream (emla? I think) that does a WORLD of difference for the pain (besides the pain in your pocket-book). Many visits were required for the horse and when you pick a doctor, there's no guarantees at all. Just like a tat artist, look for before and after photos. Without the emla, it is extreamly painfull. The laser, which is held off of your skin at the exact right distance (in my case the ruby q switched laser) looks like it is 'boiling' your very skin with each zap. Each "zap" is small, maybe 1/3 inch round, so you have to get lots each visit. You heal for a few weeks and then go back quite a few times. If the doctor goes over the same spot too many times, a permanent black outline of a circle starts to develop. I also have a butterfly/flower vine on my leg that looks very unsightly. I scratched it and got it wet when I first got it and there was green in it. I plan on getting a coverup for it when I can afford it. That was my aim until recently I thought , wow, why not get a tat you like first?! So, I felt a lot happier about a new tat instead of trying to come up with something to cover the old tat. Whatever you do, do NOT try the old fashioned way of rubbing salt onto the tat. Your tat will still show and you will get terrible, unsightly scars over your skin. Well, I hope this helps. b <>< ~ ~ ~ . . . -
-
Re: Laser Removal?
Fri, June 19, 2009 - 1:16 PMI have a friend who had to have a pretty large tattoo removed from her neck for professional reasons, she had lazer and it looks great, it left a few spots that look like pale freckles. It was a very large piece she said it cost several thousand dollars but was well worth it to her as it meant the difference in getting her dream job. She described the pain as a bad sunburn with little needles in it. I worked in a tattoo shop for a few years and a couple of our clients had had old pieces surgically removed, the lazer seems like the way to go for sure.
-