Advertisement
"End Times" discussion was a large part of my up-bringing. The "Thief in the Night" movie series was basically the belief I was taught (www.armageddonbooks.com/thief.html). Recently, I heard that a belief in the 1000 year reign of Christ was called Chiliasm and was declared a heresy a long, long time ago - and yet is pretty close to what is taught now-a-days.
I am currently leaning towards a different understanding than what I was taught. I am wondering if there is anyone who would be interested in sharing their understanding of the end times. Maybe there is a word that God would say to me from your own up-bringings.
Thanks in advance.
I am currently leaning towards a different understanding than what I was taught. I am wondering if there is anyone who would be interested in sharing their understanding of the end times. Maybe there is a word that God would say to me from your own up-bringings.
Thanks in advance.
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: "End Times"
Tue, October 20, 2009 - 11:22 AMThe enemy sure seems to have 're-written' a lot of the conceptual thoughts that many this side of the fence seem to have about the 'end times'.
Weeding through all the mess is no easy task, to say the least. There's a guy down in texas, Irving Baxter, who heads a ministry called 'End Time Ministry', and though the community of visionaries joke about his lack of sight, they all admit something to the effect of 'even a blind squirrel can get a nut.'
I recognize however, that he is working the spot of the mountain of truth that the Lord wants him to, so such quips about the man have very little ground in my heart... he has a great deal of accurate research concerning prophecies in the bible and what's going on today.
Most people who expel trash from their mouths about the end times are often pointing at just one event, and attempting to use that one event to prove something that requires no less than 20 events to take place at the same time, though only 6 or 7 of them will be known world wide. Irving focuses on the ones that will be visible world wide as signs of the end of this age.
his web page is here www.endtime.com/
I do take a grain of salt about what the visionary community seems to think about him though, it would seem most of his focus is on the physical realm, and I wonder how much of what was revealed to the prophets before us was purely events that take place in the spiritual realms. I do know much of revelation had happened before the man who wrote it even lived. Revelation, like Genesis, like Enoch's writings, are all 'mini-bibles'... they tell the same story different ways.
Baxter's right about the important events though... they're all taking place before our eyes.
Then, as I've mentioned in a small amount of detail, Rick Joyner's ministry speaks a lot about these end times taking place soon, now even.... but his perspective is primarily for the ones who will lead the Bride of Christ out of the Egyptian way of life and demonic hold that has nearly strangled the bride already. This is the ministry that the visionaries tend towards, but most of us are a ragged bunch of hippie type folk. There is a lot of wisdom about what's taking place now, but it's all such a monumental retro-fit to the entire christian ministry that it seems brand new heresy... simply because we've forgotten the old ways of love and community at large.
his website is www.morningstarministries.org/
rick's ministry has a great deal of focus on different levels of understanding the Creator, and I guess I'm trying to point you to ministries at different levels and takes on the Cross, so that you can explore this from more than one angle... it would maybe help you find a better perspective on what the churches at large have to say about it, and what their common threads are about it... there is truth throughout the different ministries about this... but like we know, it's hard to glean the truth from so much crap that's been placed over it by the hand of man, and the enemy.
One thing, I know to be true, is where the idea of a pre-tribulation rapture comes from.
It is the enemy's doctrine. Being such, that when the time of the beast is in full power, the christian people will be easily found in their homes on the grid, waiting to get beamed up, just to find themselves in the nazi style detention camps. This doctrine is perhaps the most disarming doctrine that has presented itself upon the Church... subtly teaching that while the beast is rising to power, we as christians should just submit to it and not resist it... cuz we're going to get beamed up rest of the world be damned.
that's certainly not along the lines of love for all of our fellow men... and further more the pre-trib rapture doctrine came out in 1850 or so, from a pastor's daughter who was known to be very taken by fits of violence... and had a 'dream' about this. That dream was then sold as truth, though the source was questionable at best.
The, International House of Prayer, seems to have the most practical knowledge about what's going on... and it is one of the only ministries, that the prophets of today fully trust. They however, are not without error within themselves, for none of us are perfect. But they've been doing a great job of equipping the saints and preparing for this all. Some of the most received prophecies about what's taking place now were received by 'bob jones' 30 years ago... but even he admits that he's not a pure prophet, that it is this generation standing now, that has much more pure prophecy than he did.
www.ihop.org/ You can witness a live stream of their 24 hour 7 day a week, prayer service... much prophecy comes out from there... you might even be impacted by it, who know's eh?
I'm almost afraid to mention this next ministry...Christian International, for something in my heart has been nagging at me for a while, about how their leadership may have gone astray and been put to sleep.
I've been at the headquarters of all of these ministries (except baxter's) in my travels across our dying nation, and this one, though I stayed with them the longest... was the only ministry I saw incur the wrath more than the blessings... and even now they are financially struggling more so than the rest presently. It was here in fact, that I learned first hand about praying against hurricanes, for they made a tremendous error of arrogance... making a 'new Israel down in Florida. You can see the eyes of the leadership on their web page, all of them very dark...
i could be wrong, and i'm not trying to judge their salvation or whatever... i just have that nagging in my heart you know.
however, they have been visited by many such as myself, working with them to drop the things that they hold to... and some of the truth has made it through their ministry.
ok.. so those are the ministries that i know who have even openly touched this subject matter, (though i'm sure many smaller ones have as well) and there's a lot to sort through.
here's some starter truth to work with, though I myself do not know the answer to every thing about this matter...
it has however been a subject of much interest and research, since, well... i know that everything the Lord has been preparing me for is for facing the last lashes of the beast against these beautiful people.
The beasts that Daniel saw in his visions, are all combined in john's vision in revelation, which is what scripture supports the 'one world government' from baxter's research...
america will cede its sovereignty to that world government in 9 weeks when obama signs the treaty to do just that. That's the real news under this health care sideshow.
However, the beast that represented britian/america, is not a part of the world beast at the time it takes the lives of whatever saint it can. There is much controversy over why this is, but it would appear the most accurate description is that america is utterly dissolved into pieces... and i just came across the world government's plans to divide america up and dissolve us into canada, mexico, russia, and china.
the bible says the beast crushed to pieces the nations that stood against it... and there has been 1,000s of protests against the new world order here in the states even just this year... though the media scews and won't cover most of them.
the last protest we had on the D.C. mall the media wrote off as 10,000s... though there were obviously more like 2 million people there from the security camera footage... for instance.
the abomination that creates desolation has to stand...
ever wonder why obama's policies are to bulldoze foreclosed homes when we have millions of new homeless people? Isn't that some sort of obamanation.
earthquakes, hurricanes, storms increasing dramatically...
average number of storms in the month of june up until 2006 were 170 storms for the whole nation of america.
one week in june we had 277 storms, followed by 165, and then 230ish... blew the average straight out of the water.
there would be signs and wonders in the heavens.... the sun's been doing strange stuff according to nasa.. but even closer to home, people claiming they've seen movies in the clouds seem to be a common thing to hear about today.
what is the 1,000 year reign of peace?
it could be many things, perhaps even just the spirit of Christ in us so much that we finally take the earth and care for it like we're supposed to, finally.
it's so hard to understand that part, you know? maybe we the Body, are the force to change the evil from the world, I don't know if it's truth to say that, but that's as fringe as i'm willing to imagine myself as possible things that might come from this next war between the free peoples and the beasts.
the 144,000 are already standing and walking amongst us. The weather often marks which ones they are.
there's a start Geppy, i know it's a lot, but I'll come back to this as needed or w/e... peace and grace to you!
-
-
Re: "End Times"
Tue, October 20, 2009 - 1:47 PMFor the record, totally agreed on the rapture. Scripture proved that idea wrong enough to me decades ago - even though I am the only person in my family to not believe it. Every one thinks I'm silly.
I'll check out the sites you've linked Jason. Thanks. -
-
Re: "End Times"
Wed, October 21, 2009 - 8:25 PMI wouldn't mind being beamed up mind ya... some day's more than others, lol.
How goes the search?
-
-
-
Re: "End Times"
Sun, December 6, 2009 - 6:45 PM
Hey Geppy.
The "Thief in the Night" movie you referenced seems similar to the recent "Left Behind" series. Here's why I don't think the concept is Biblical, or true.
Matthew 13: 24 Jesus presented another parable to them, saying, “The kingdom of heaven may be compared to a man who sowed good seed in his field. 25 “But while his men were sleeping, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat, and went away. 26 “But when the wheat sprouted and bore grain, then the tares became evident also. 27 “The slaves of the landowner came and said to him, ‘Sir, did you not sow good seed in your field? How then does it have tares?’ 28 “And he said to them, ‘An enemy has done this!’ The slaves said to him, ‘Do you want us, then, to go and gather them up?’ 29 “But he said, ‘No; for while you are gathering up the tares, you may uproot the wheat with them. 30 ‘Allow both to grow together until the harvest; and in the time of the harvest I will say to the reapers, “First gather up the tares and bind them in bundles to burn them up; but gather the wheat into my barn." '
Here it is written that the tares are what is gathered first. The tares are what was sown by the enemy. It appears similar to wheat, in its infancy, but is not.
Hebrews 12: 25 See to it that you do not refuse Him who is speaking. For if those did not escape when they refused him who warned them on earth, much less will we escape who turn away from Him who warns from heaven. 26 And His voice shook the earth then, but now He has promised, saying, “YET ONCE MORE I WILL SHAKE NOT ONLY THE EARTH, BUT ALSO THE HEAVEN.” 27 This expression, “Yet once more,” denotes the removing of those things which can be shaken, as of created things, so that those things which cannot be shaken may remain. 28 Therefore, since we receive a kingdom which cannot be shaken, let us show gratitude, by which we may offer to God an acceptable service with reverence and awe; 29 for our God is a consuming fire.
When there is a time of removal, what is removed are those things which can be shaken, in order that those things which cannot be shaken may remain.
Also, in the Bible, I do not understand a consuming fire to be a reference to a nuclear holocaust. Fire consumes certain elements and refines others. Remember the Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego?
1 Thessalonians 4: 13 But we do not want you to be uninformed, brethren, about those who are asleep, so that you will not grieve as do the rest who have no hope. 14 For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so God will bring with Him those who have fallen asleep in Jesus. 15 For this we say to you by the word of the Lord, that we who are alive and remain until the coming of the Lord, will not precede those who have fallen asleep. 16 For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first. 17 Then we who are alive and remain will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air, and so we shall always be with the Lord. 18 Therefore comfort one another with these words.
The Greek word "harpagésómetha" is translated "will be caught up". In Latin translation the word "rapere" is used, from which comes the English "rapture".
Notice that those who are alive and remain will be caught up when Jesus is returning and descending from heaven, not when he is departing and ascending into heaven.
Acts 1: 9After he said this, he was taken up before their very eyes, and a cloud hid him from their sight. 10They were looking intently up into the sky as he was going, when suddenly two men dressed in white stood beside them. 11“Men of Galilee,” they said, “why do you stand here looking into the sky? This same Jesus, who has been taken from you into heaven, will come back in the same way you have seen him go into heaven.”
I think the "Left Behind" concept has more to do with moderns fearing enduring persecution than what is written in Scripture.
Matthew 24: 4 And Jesus answered and said to them, “See to it that no one misleads you. 5 “For many will come in My name, saying, ‘I am the Christ,’ and will mislead many. 6 “You will be hearing of wars and rumors of wars. See that you are not frightened, for those things must take place, but that is not yet the end. 7 “For nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom, and in various places there will be famines and earthquakes. 8 “But all these things are merely the beginning of birth pangs.
9 “Then they will deliver you to tribulation, and will kill you, and you will be hated by all nations because of My name. 10 “At that time many will fall away and will betray one another and hate one another. 11 “Many false prophets will arise and will mislead many. 12 “Because lawlessness is increased, most people’s love will grow cold. 13 “But the one who endures to the end, he will be saved. 14 “This gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all the nations, and then the end will come. -
-
Re: "End Times"
Wed, December 9, 2009 - 9:58 AMGreat response Peter, I am in agreement with you regarding the rapture doctrine, however I wanted to make one point in your transalation:
<Because lawlessness is increased, most people’s love will grow cold. >
the Greek word translated as iniquity in the new testament is Adikia:
wiki.answers.com/Q/Does_th...hidden_sin
adikia (Strong #93) which means:
"(1) injustice, of a judge; (2) unrighteousness of heart and life; (3) a deed violating law and justice, an act of unrighteousness."
So the correct translation is not "Lawlessness" but "the behavior of lawlessness" or "acts of injustice"
This is an important distinction for many reasons, for one, as christians we are no longer under the law, so many false prophets attempt to use your definition of "iniquity" to justify returning again to the law, and there are many such lawful Christians who are guilty of acts of great injustice, for example the christian rights support of the Iraq war. It is not the lack of law that is being describe here, but the behavior. A Christian is no longer under the law but his/her behavior is ruled by the spirit:
Rom 2:25 ¶ For circumcision verily profiteth, if thou keep the law: but if thou be a breaker of the law, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision.
Rom 2:26 Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
Rom 2:27 And shall not uncircumcision which is by nature, if it fulfil the law, judge thee, who by the letter and circumcision dost transgress the law?
Rom 2:28 For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither [is that] circumcision, which is outward in the flesh:
Rom 2:29 But he [is] a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision [is that] of the heart, in the spirit, [and] not in the letter; whose praise [is] not of men, but of God.
-
-
Re: "End Times"
Wed, December 9, 2009 - 4:57 PMJohn,
Actually, what you presented regarding translation is not correct.
<the Greek word translated as iniquity in the new testament is Adikia... So the correct translation is not "Lawlessness" >
In Matthew 24:12, the Greek word translated "lawlessness" or "iniquity" is "anomian", and not "adikia." Perhaps "without law" would be the more literal translation.
<there are many such lawful Christians who are guilty of acts of great injustice>
If by "lawful" you mean observant of Mosaic/Levitical Law, I'm not aware of ANY Christians alive today who observe Mosaic Law, which is also a blood covenant. Do you know any Christians who have entered into that blood covenant?
Certainly, that one practices some of the Mosaic Laws does not excuse one from practicing justice and mercy. Even when that covenant was active, Jesus had explained:
Matthew 23: 23"Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you tithe mint and dill and cummin, and have neglected the weightier provisions of the law: justice and mercy and faithfulness; but these are the things you should have done without neglecting the others. 24"You blind guides, who strain out a gnat and swallow a camel! 25"Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you clean the outside of the cup and of the dish, but inside they are full of robbery and self-indulgence. 26"You blind Pharisee, first clean the inside of the cup and of the dish, so that the outside of it may become clean also.
That one observes external Mosaic laws of clean and unclean, does not necessarily mean that one is clean within. And that one is not observant of Mosaic Law does not mean one is without law.
Hebrews 7:11Now if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood (for on the basis of it the people received the Law), what further need was there for another priest to arise according to the order of Melchizedek, and not be designated according to the order of Aaron? 12For when the priesthood is changed, of necessity there takes place a change of law also.
It is my understanding that the change was to the law of the Spirit of Life in Christ Jesus.
Romans 8: 1Therefore there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus. 2For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has set you free from the law of sin and of death. 3For what the Law could not do, weak as it was through the flesh, God did: sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and as an offering for sin, He condemned sin in the flesh, 4so that the requirement of the Law might be fulfilled in us, who do not walk according to the flesh but according to the Spirit.
In any case, it seems we can agree that in Christ we are not under Mosaic Law, but led by the Holy Spirit. -
-
Re: "End Times"
Wed, December 9, 2009 - 11:59 PMI don't know why I waste time with this kind of stuff, as I prefer to trust the translators. But then, it only takes a few seconds to look it up on the computer.
Mat 24:12 AndG2532 because iniquityG458 shall abound,G4129 theG3588 loveG26 of manyG4183 shall wax cold.G5594
G458
ἀνομία
anomia
an-om-ee'-ah
From G459; illegality, that is, violation of law or (generally) wickedness: - iniquity, X transgress (-ion of) the law, unrighteousness.
Interesting, how that "love of many" could be interpreted two ways. It could be many people's love, or it could be "love of many" as opposed to "love of self". I suppose it doesn't matter, we don't really call "love of self" love, rather we call it greed or selfishness. Real love is love of others.. -
-
Re: "End Times"
Thu, December 10, 2009 - 6:06 AMI think you need both. I think greed and selfishness are self-love without love of others. Love of others without self love would be... masochism? -
-
Re: "End Times"
Thu, December 10, 2009 - 10:12 AM<I think you need both. I think greed and selfishness are self-love without love of others. Love of others without self love would be... masochism?>
ultimately the love of others is the love of self and God. The amount we are willing to sacrifice for a stranger or even an enemy is reflective of our trust and love of God. When we believe that God is just and rewards the righteous, then we are willing to even lay down our lifes for our friends, isn't that the example Jesus gave us? Consider these verses:
Mat 5:38 ¶ Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth:
Mat 5:39 But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Mat 5:40 And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have [thy] cloke also.
Mat 5:41 And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him twain.
Mat 5:42 Give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away.
Mat 5:43 ¶ Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy.
Mat 5:44 But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Mat 5:45 That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.
Mat 5:46 For if ye love them which love you, what reward have ye? do not even the publicans the same?
Mat 5:47 And if ye salute your brethren only, what do ye more [than others]? do not even the publicans so?
Mat 5:48 Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.
Jesus makes the point here that to love your family is not a Christian love, not that it is bad, but that even the unrighteous are able to love themselves and their own family. If you aspire to the holy love of spirit then it will be one that gives even to your enemy and sacrifices for strangers. No greater Christian exists among us then he that would willingly give up his life for a stranger. At the end of our journey as Christian we will all face this choice to love and trust God enough to lay down our lives.
-
-
Re: "End Times"
Thu, December 10, 2009 - 5:02 PMwhy trust a man to translate, when the Holy Spirit's got 'ranma' if you just ask for it. -
-
Re: "End Times"
Thu, December 10, 2009 - 8:18 PMJack,
<why trust a man to translate, when the Holy Spirit's got 'ranma' if you just ask for it.>
What is "ranma"?
And when you explain what it is, should I trust your translation? ; ) -
-
Re: "End Times"
Fri, December 11, 2009 - 2:19 AMthe point is peter, you, like me, like everyone here can take the words we read in the bible before the Lord of Hosts and ask Him to grant us wisdom to understand. Take God out of the box for pete's sake. -
-
Re: "End Times"
Fri, December 11, 2009 - 1:38 PMJack,
<the point is peter, you, like me, like everyone here can take the words we read in the bible before the Lord of Hosts and ask Him to grant us wisdom to understand.>
LOL!
If this is really what you believe the point is, why did you start posting here?
The description of this tribe begins:
"A place to discuss what it means to follow Jesus Christ beyond the construct of religion.
Believers & Seekers are welcome."
I do not assume that everyone discussing here is a "Christian".
<Take God out of the box for pete's sake.>
In what box do you imagine I have placed God? -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: "End Times"
Fri, December 11, 2009 - 7:06 PMbecause the person who needed it didn't think to ask.... ever. -
-
Arrogance
Fri, December 11, 2009 - 10:32 PMJack,
Why do you persist in making ignorant, self-justifying statements?
<because the person who needed it didn't think to ask.... ever.>
Why do you imagine anyone in this tribe hasn't ever thought to ask God for wisdom?
Into what box have I placed God?
What is "ranma"?
-
-
-
-
-
Re: "End Times"
Thu, December 10, 2009 - 8:41 PMJack: <why trust a man to translate, when the Holy Spirit's got 'ranma' if you just ask for it.>
I would put forth 1 Cor 14 as the answer to this. The purpose of having others around to translate is to edify the entirety of the church. Having the Holy Spirit translate for you only edifies yourself. The Body of Christ is about everyone; not just our own selves. -
-
Re: "End Times"
Fri, December 11, 2009 - 2:14 AMInteresting. Do you tell your children, when they ask about sex, that they should listen to "everyone" and do as they do?
The "everyone" you speak of is going downhill fast in moral decline. The "everyone" you speak of is soon going to die in nuclear war. If you listen to them, you'll die with them.
Lemmings listen to "everyone" and they run off the cliff and die. People are doing the same thing.
It seems to me that God is looking for people who can think for themselves. Did God say "everyone" will be saved?
Tony -
-
Re: "End Times"
Fri, December 11, 2009 - 5:12 AMTony, who said anything about listening to everyone?
But, if none of us listen to the "translation" that God gives to the brethren and we live our lives the way that we "translate" then we have been misled. No one has a completely accurate and honest understanding of God - which is why we need to listen to our brethren; so God can speak to us threw them. That is part of what happens here on this message board.
-
Re: "End Times"
Fri, December 11, 2009 - 5:43 PM<The "everyone" you speak of is going downhill fast in moral decline. The "everyone" you speak of is soon going to die in nuclear war. If you listen to them, you'll die with them.
>
I don't think Geppy was advocating that we should do what everyone does, but that we have a responsibility to share our spirit given revelations with others, as well as, to expect revelations to be consistent with the teachings of Jesus and the apostles.
-
-
Re: "End Times"
Fri, December 11, 2009 - 2:18 AMhe was referring to limiting God to only the words written in the bible?? yet the last time i checked, Yahweh was larger than the universe He created. -
-
Re: "End Times"
Fri, December 11, 2009 - 5:16 AMJack, am I the "he" in your last statement? If so, no I am not limiting God to only the words written in the Scriptures. Scripture is clear that God speaks to each of us daily. It is also clear that misleading spirits speak daily for any who would listen. It is also clear that we are all fallen creatures and do not have a full understanding of God. It is also clear that we are the Body of Christ - his Bride; and as such we are meant to live and work together - not completely as individuals.
And I say this as one who currently does not attend a church, but still live among members of the Body and speak with them. So please don't confuse my words as referring to the church bodies only.
-
-
Re: "End Times"
Fri, December 11, 2009 - 5:39 PM<Jack: <why trust a man to translate, when the Holy Spirit's got 'ranma' if you just ask for it.>
I would put forth 1 Cor 14 as the answer to this. The purpose of having others around to translate is to edify the entirety of the church. Having the Holy Spirit translate for you only edifies yourself. The Body of Christ is about everyone; not just our own selves. >
Good answer Geppy
-
Re: "End Times"
Fri, December 11, 2009 - 7:09 PMgeppy would put forth 1 Cor 14 as the answer to this. The purpose of having others around to translate is to edify the entirety of the church. Having the Holy Spirit translate for you only edifies yourself. The Body of Christ is about everyone; not just our own selves.
this is for tongues?
the written record is something very different.
new records of the comings and goings of the Holy Spirit are written every day,
many,
in our hearts. -
-
Re: "End Times"
Fri, December 11, 2009 - 7:57 PM<new records of the comings and goings of the Holy Spirit are written every day,
many,
in our hearts.>
I don't disagree with you, the holy spirit is the authority of our faith:
Jhn 14:26 But the Comforter, [which is] the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.
-
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: "End Times"
Fri, December 11, 2009 - 8:11 PMJhn 14:26 But the Comforter, [which is] the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.
sounds like checkmate to me,
but always take the grain of salt,
and test every spirit. -
-
Re: "End Times"
Fri, December 11, 2009 - 8:27 PM<but always take the grain of salt,
and test every spirit.>
Here are some more verses to consider:
1Jo 2:27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.
I don't recommend testing the holy spirit:
Act 5:8 And Peter answered unto her, Tell me whether ye sold the land for so much? And she said, Yea, for so much.
Act 5:9 Then Peter said unto her, How is it that ye have agreed together to tempt the Spirit of the Lord? behold, the feet of them which have buried thy husband [are] at the door, and shall carry thee out.
Act 5:10 Then fell she down straightway at his feet, and yielded up the ghost: and the young men came in, and found her dead, and, carrying [her] forth, buried [her] by her husband.
-
-
Re: "End Times"
Fri, December 11, 2009 - 8:31 PMjust like you don't test God, unless He tells you to,
but but but but but but...
when you first encounter the Holy Spirit,
when you are not yet familiar with it...
test what it tells you,
seek it's truth out,
that's what i means
-
Re: "End Times"
Sat, December 12, 2009 - 2:25 AMSince you brought up these verses Acts 5:8-10 (in John's post), I figured maybe some people don't know what those verses are about.
The Apostles setup a shared income commune, which they believed was they way Christ taught them to live. That is, no selfishness, everyone sharing all their income and their money with the community. The woman, Peter was talking to, and her husband sold their home but in secret held back part of the money from the sale, to keep for themselves. That is, the sale of their own home, they kept part of their money. For that, they both died. The woman, after seeing her husband die, still was unwilling to part with the money, as money was her god.
This ought to give people some idea of what God intends. A new society will be setup, and the money god will be destroyed, along with all those who refuse to give it up. The new society will be moneyless society. I've been hoping that we can save all people, but only God knows.
See, money is a reward training system. It rewards people to be selfish. The more selfish or greedy you are, the more money you get. It is that, which has taken away people's love, and caused all the problems in the world today. Once the money system is gone, so to will war, poverty, and global warming be gone.
Tony -
-
Re: "End Times"
Sat, December 12, 2009 - 5:18 AMKeeping some money was not the issue in Acts 5. Read verses 1-7 and you will see that the land was theirs, the money after the sale was theirs - and it was completely up to them to do as they chose to do. The fault for which they died was lying to the Holy Spirit and claiming that the part of the sale that they gave to the community was the entirety of the amount for which they sold it.
And of course on top of that were the laws regarding land, that after so many years the land would revert back to that family anyway. Having land or having money was not a sin for which they died, as that "ownership" is a part of life in Israel; a part of the laws that God gave. -
-
Re: "End Times"
Sat, December 12, 2009 - 12:47 PMAct 4:32 And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common.
Act 4:33 And with great power gave the apostles witness of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus: and great grace was upon them all.
Act 4:34 Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold,
Act 4:35 And laid them down at the apostles' feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need.
You can think what you want, but it is clear to me that either a person is with the community "of one heart and of one soul" or a person is not. There really is no middle ground. It is basically like saying, you are either with us or you are not.
Do you really think a person would die for lying? Is lying even illegal by God's law? False testimony, yes, but lying? Especially a little white lie like that? Get real!
Technically, the Abraham in the Bible didn't lie, but I'd still call him a lier. He deliberately deceived, which In my book, makes him a lier (as well as a wimp and a weasel). So why didn't God vaporize him? For those who don't remember, Abraham told his wife not to tell people that she is his wife, but rather tell them she is his sister. It was technically true, but deliberately misleading. He did other similar things as well. In fact, he got rich off of it. He was basically a professional con artist, you might say.
Tony -
-
Re: "End Times"
Sat, December 12, 2009 - 3:08 PMtony, your dangerous territory is small but crucial.
being of the same heart and same soul, is not the same 'thoughts'
remember each God-given personality,
comes,
in
our
individual thought.
any skeptic of the cross who just read what you just wrote tony
would joke in secret about some jim jones cool-aid and that type of documentary.
same heart, same spirit, all different parts of a body,
all different ideas
like the 'smurfs'
-
-
Re: "End Times"
Sun, December 13, 2009 - 12:33 AMI never said a person couldn't have their own thoughts. Also, I'm would not kill people for such, obviously, nor would I even hate such people. I might not even kick them out of the community, since our world has so few people who don't disobey that. I'm just pointing out what those people died for.
Money is not a thought, it is a god. The first commandment is to have no other gods before God. You can have other gods, as long as you don't place them before God. This is what that woman and her husband did. They put the money god before God. That is not individual thinking, that is totally going against God.
Tony -
-
Re: "End Times"
Sun, December 13, 2009 - 1:16 AMI should probably point out, that when people don't have that "love", in a shared commune they become a burden to the commune. They don't work, and they encourage others to not work, and soon the whole commune is dragged down. The Apostles didn't have the whole solution, not all the problems were worked out at that time, so perhaps it was necessary for God to make an example of a few people, to prevent the early collapse of the commune.
I've been thinking that a requirement of 1000 hours of unpaid labor given to the commune, would be a way for the new members to prove their love. Also, if a member starts causing problems, they'll have to be expelled or something.
Tony -
-
Re: "End Times"
Sun, December 13, 2009 - 6:31 PMTony,
<I've been thinking that a requirement of 1000 hours of unpaid labor given to the commune, would be a way for the new members to prove their love. Also, if a member starts causing problems, they'll have to be expelled or something.>
There have been disciplines since the beginning.
2 Thessalonians 3: 7For you yourselves know how you ought to follow our example, because we did not act in an undisciplined manner among you, 8nor did we eat anyone's bread without paying for it, but with labor and hardship we kept working night and day so that we would not be a burden to any of you; 9not because we do not have the right to this, but in order to offer ourselves as a model for you, so that you would follow our example. 10For even when we were with you, we used to give you this order: if anyone is not willing to work, then he is not to eat, either.
1 Corinthians 5: 11 But actually, I wrote to you not to associate with any so-called brother if he is an immoral person, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or a swindler—not even to eat with such a one. 12 For what have I to do with judging outsiders? Do you not judge those who are within the church? 13 But those who are outside, God judges. REMOVE THE WICKED MAN FROM AMONG YOURSELVES.
No need to reinvent the wheel! : ) -
-
Re: "End Times"
Sun, December 13, 2009 - 7:27 PM<1 Corinthians 5: 11 But actually, I wrote to you not to associate with any so-called brother if he is an immoral person, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or a swindler—not even to eat with such a one. 12 For what have I to do with judging outsiders? Do you not judge those who are within the church? 13 But those who are outside, God judges. REMOVE THE WICKED MAN FROM AMONG YOURSELVES.
>
Personally I question the revellance of this in the modern world. At the time they suffered persecution and death. I am sure in some countries a commune is required, but not in most. I do not believe that seperating ourselves out physically is important, but seperating our selves out spiritually that is important. -
-
Re: "End Times"
Sun, December 13, 2009 - 9:00 PMwhen the beast cuts of the energy,
oil
power,
and water
if you wanna survive,
you'll be communal with sustainables
like it or not,
when it's amerika outside.
and it's just about amerika outside. -
-
Re: "End Times"
Sun, December 13, 2009 - 11:02 PMThere are many communes in the USA. Most are not fully self reliant. There is really little or no danger of "the Beast" cutting off oil, power, and water. The USA has laws.
Tony
-
-
Re: "End Times"
Sun, December 13, 2009 - 10:56 PMYou are a product of your environment. You can not disconnect the spiritual from the physical, they are one and the same. Otherwise, why would there be rules against various types of behavior? The rules are there, because if you do certain things, it'll destroy your spirit. Likewise, our system of society is destroying people's spirits.
Tony -
-
Re: "End Times"
Sun, December 13, 2009 - 11:25 PMi fail to see how you stating the obvious here, has anything to with what I just said.
There is one rule.
Love God with all of you, and treat your neighbor as you would yourself.
everything after that, comes from a community that agrees,
not one blind person who leads.
-
-
-
Re: "End Times"
Sun, December 13, 2009 - 11:21 PMJesus says "Judge not" and Paul says "Judge". Who do you follow?
We must stay away from judging as much as possible. Let people judge themselves. Judge people badly, and they'll start to hate the community and become disruptive. Not just the people who were judged, but others who see the injustice.
Even kicking people out who don't work is risky. A person might be working very hard, but show no evidence of the work. A thinker, for example, does his or her work inside the mind, and often there is nothing to show for that work on the outside, for a long time. A very valuable worker could be lost in that way. I figure we'll have a small amount of required work, which will cover the cost, so little or nothing is lost if the person does no other work.
Another solution I've found, is to have activity planners, who's job is to make life fun for everyone in the community. If people like living there, they'll love the community more, and then they'll work harder and put up with system flaws better. We can't expect the system to be perfect, but if we can get people to overlook little flaws, that'll be close enough.
Tony -
-
Community
Mon, December 14, 2009 - 7:30 AMJohn,
<Jesus says "Judge not" and Paul says "Judge". Who do you follow?>
We have what is written so that those of us who came after might have some understanding of what came before us. We're discussing what is written. Jesus didn't write anything.
Jesus and the first Apostles were members of the Jewish community which had established laws concerning their relationship to each other and to Yahweh.
Paul establish spiritual communities among Gentiles who had no previous relationship to each other or to Yahweh.
The word disciple suggests disciplines. The word of church is from the Greek ecclessia, meaning called out ones.
The communities of called out ones have had rules and disciplines from the beginning. Those of Jerusalem/Jewish "church" differed from those of the Gentile "church".
(Paul was going through a cleansing before he could meet with the Jerusalem church leaders when he was arrested.)
In any case, if today you think you can establish a Christian community without rules and discipline, I think that's like saying today you can start a school with no teaching.
The rules and teaching of the ecclessia are not established by man's reason. They are established by the Father and manifest through Holy Spirit filled men. And, as I see it, that is what Ananais and Saphira were testing, the Spirit in men. But they did not recognize the nature of the Spirit in that community, and they were struck dead.
Today many churches accept liars as their leaders. That's where their understand of "judge not" has led them. Nobody being struck dead, but nobody being healed through them either.
<Judge people badly, and they'll start to hate the community and become disruptive. Not just the people who were judged, but others who see the injustice.>
Of course people will oppose injustice. We should.
<We can't expect the system to be perfect, but if we can get people to overlook little flaws, that'll be close enough.>
Perhaps we differ in that I do not see the Church community as a system. It is a relationship of oneness that is created through the Holy Spirit.
And there will always be tares among the wheat.
The Corinthian church was instructed to put a man out because of his sin. They were also reminded to restore him when he repented. Love covers a multitude of sins.
-
-
Re: Community
Mon, December 14, 2009 - 7:31 AMMy last "Community" post was actually to Tony.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Satan
Sat, December 12, 2009 - 4:04 PMTony,
Jesus had said to Peter get behind me Satan, you are a stumbling block/offense because you are not setting your mind on God's interests, but man's. That same spirit manifested in the heart of Ananais.
They lied to men, not recognizing that the spiritual community is a manifestation of the Holy Spirit of God.
The offense seems, to me, a matter of the heart, not of the lips.
Perhaps, Annanais and Saphira were motivated by envy, which seems to me why their story is preceded by the telling of the Levite who sold a field he owned and brought the money to the apostles. The Levite's inheritance is Yahweh, so perhaps he had no expectation for the land to return in the year of Jubilee.
In Acts 4, the believers all came to be of one heart and mind after they were all filled with the Holy Spirit. I don't see it as a design of human effort by the Apostles. I think it was a kind "miracle" natural to the new nature.
There is no need for a physical coming of Jesus or a nuclear holocaust for the spiritual community to manifest. It didn't take that before. It doesn't require that now. What it did/does require was/is unified prayer, and for a place to be shaken by the Holy Spirit.
Acts 4: 31After they prayed, the place where they were meeting was shaken. And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and spoke the word of God boldly. 32 All the believers were one in heart and mind. No one claimed that any of his possessions was his own, but they shared everything they had. 33With great power the apostles continued to testify to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus, and much grace was upon them all.
I do not know how much time transpired between this filling and the selling of the land.
You wrote:
<it is clear to me that either a person is with the community "of one heart and of one soul" or a person is not.>
As you see it, if Satan had filled Ananais' heart to lie to the believers, was Ananais with the community "of one heart and soul"?
And if the believers held all they possessed in common, why does Peter tell Ananais the property and money was his to do with as he pleased? -
-
Re: Satan
Sun, December 13, 2009 - 12:48 AMPeter was just pointing out to him that he doesn't actually Love God, as he thought he did. When you love someone, you don't lie to them.
Tony
-
-
-
Re: "End Times"
Sun, December 13, 2009 - 6:41 AM<and it was completely up to them to do as they chose to do. The fault for which they died was lying to the Holy Spirit and claiming that the part of the sale that they gave to the community was the entirety of the amount for which they sold it.>
Thats half of it, the other half is why they lied, they tested the holy spirit to see if it would be able reveal their lie. The sin was the testing of the holy spirit, no need for anyone to add any more to this, or speculate, it says clearly why they were punished in this manner:
Act 5:9 Then Peter said unto her, How is it that ye have agreed together to tempt the Spirit of the Lord? behold, the feet of them which have buried thy husband [are] at the door, and shall carry thee out. -
-
Re: "End Times"
Sun, December 13, 2009 - 6:51 AM
focusonjerusalem.com/temptation.html
"Peirazo—to try, to prove in either a good or bad sense, also to prove by solicitation to sin (Matthew 4:1, 3; 16:1; 19:3; 22:18, 35; Mark 1:13; 8:11; 10:2; 12:15; Luke 4:2; 11:16; 29:23; John 8:6; Acts 5:9; 15:10; 1 Corinthians 7:5; 10: 9,13; Galatians 6:1; 1 Thessalonians 3:5; Hebrews 2:18; 3:9; 4:15; 11:37; James 1:13a, 14)."
This was their crime to tempt by solicitation to sin, they saught to provoke the holy spirit, and so they did. So it wasn't an issue of lieing or stealing or disrupting a commune, it was about proving the holy spirit to be evil by testing it. What would happen if we kept a secret from the community would the spirit reveal us? could it? that what is test that that they conspired together to perform and that is the cause of their deaths. So my point was I would not test the holy spirit, but I suppose one could argue that it is the kind of testing that is wrong here, to tempt the spirit to sin. -
-
The Holy Spirit in Men
Sun, December 13, 2009 - 6:14 PMJohn,
<So it wasn't an issue of lieing or stealing or disrupting a commune, it was about proving the holy spirit to be evil by testing it. What would happen if we kept a secret from the community would the spirit reveal us? could it? that what is test that that they conspired together to perform and that is the cause of their deaths.>
It seems you are separating the Holy Spirit from the community, or am I misreading you?
<they tested the holy spirit to see if it would be able reveal their lie.>
Ananais and Saphira were not two people shouting curses at the sky, to see if they would be struck by lightning. They were not testing God "in heaven". They laid the portion of money at the Apostles feet. And Peter said, "You have not lied to men but to God."
That the men of this new spiritual community, this new Jesus sect, should be so closely associated with the Holy Spirit that lying to them was lying to God was a great shift in the consciousness of Jews.
I think that is an important point.
-
-
Re: The Holy Spirit in Men
Sun, December 13, 2009 - 7:18 PM<That the men of this new spiritual community, this new Jesus sect, should be so closely associated with the Holy Spirit that lying to them was lying to God was a great shift in the consciousness of Jews.
I think that is an important point.
>
I disagree, it's their intention that is the crime, they did not intend on testing the people of the community but the holy spirit which they share. Peter makes this clear in Acts 5:9 that they conspired to test the holy spirit, their intention and action was to lie to God not to men.They were not seeking to test the men, but the spirit. Is the holy spirit seperate from the men? I have the holy spirit, I am not the holy spirit. The spirit is with us in us, and yet seperate from us, are you suggesting that the apostles are the spirit? if that were true then they would have been killed at the hands of the apostles and not by the spirit. The community was witness to their deaths not the judge, and not the executioners that is an important point. -
-
Re: The Holy Spirit in Men
Mon, December 14, 2009 - 6:45 AMJohn,
<Peter makes this clear in Acts 5:9 that they conspired to test the holy spirit, their intention and action was to lie to God not to men.>
I read it differently. I see this as similar to Simon Acts 8.
<The spirit is with us in us, and yet seperate from us, are you suggesting that the apostles are the spirit?>
I'm saying that's something we take for granted today. In the time of the Apostles it was a new thing that a community of ordinary Jews should be filled with the Holy Spirit. That didn't even happen during the earthly ministry of Jesus.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: "End Times"
Sat, December 12, 2009 - 5:27 AMJack: <this is for tongues?>
Yes. But define tongues. What made what they said "tongues?" It was that those around the person speaking could not understand what they were saying. You go back to Pentecost and tongues were the people speaking in other languages that people knew. It was an ability to communicate with others that could not understand what you were saying otherwise.
Now I have friends that speak English - just as I speak English. But not everything they say carries any meaning whatsoever. Therefore, what they say needs someone else who does understand to "translate" for them. It is this same concept. It is about taking words and not only turning them into a language, but forming them in a way that actually means something to those that hear.
That is all that Bible translations are also; people trying to form the language in a way that will communicate to someone else. And as to new communication from the Holy Spirit, it is not common for the Holy Spirit to only communicate an idea with a single individual - for that does not get the message out. So, as we talk to others (here or elsewhere), those thoughts bounce off other people and what the Holy Spirit says to other people. Maybe those other people heard it differently from the Spirit (for we all wear rose-colored glasses) and then they say what it meant to them. The "translating" with other people is trying to get what the Spirit shares with us all, peal away our own misinterpretations and get to the truth that was given to each of us.
That is all I was trying to say - but with much fewer English words that did not turn into a communication.
-
-
-
-
Re: "End Times"
Thu, December 10, 2009 - 9:02 PMTony,
<Interesting, how that "love of many" could be interpreted two ways.>
And there is a third way.
It is a reference to many people's love for God growing cold.
And even now many ask, "If there is a God why is there so much unfaithfulness, and hatred in the churches, and false prophets?"
But enduring in the love of God even unto the end, is salvation and the Gospel of the Kingdom
Matthew 22:35 One of them, a lawyer, asked Him a question, testing Him, 36 “Teacher, which is the great commandment in the Law?” 37 And He [Jesus] said to him, “ ‘YOU SHALL LOVE THE LORD [Yahweh] YOUR GOD WITH ALL YOUR HEART, AND WITH ALL YOUR SOUL, AND WITH ALL YOUR MIND.’ 38 “This is the great and foremost commandment.
-
-
-
-
-
Re: "End Times"
Tue, December 8, 2009 - 10:15 AMTo me, it is very clear what Jesus and God are telling us. I'm just not sure if it is just meant to scare us, or if it will actually happen. I don't believe that what is written in the Bible MUST come true, it can serve any purpose God wishes.
Jesus said there'd be "stars falling from heaven". In the primative language of the time, that was the most logical way I can think of, to say there will be a nuclear war. Stars are hydrogen fusion fireballs, so stars falling from the sky is very accurate description. It is hidden just enough to not tell mankind how to construct atomic bombs early, or give them the idea that they are possible to make, early. As far as I know, that statement didn't bring nuclear weapons ahead of what they would have been without it. Not even the following statements Jesus gave, about the sun being darkened, the sky rolled away, and the people hiding in caves, seems to have had any effect on speeding the development of nuclear weapons. Yet, the statement, to any open minded person, should be plenty obvious enough.
What I'm not sure about, is will there actually be a nuclear war, or can we prevent it. I've been wanting to believe we could prevent it, but now I'm not so sure that is God's plan.
I believe there is no such thing as a person who deserves to die, or a person who deserves to go to Heaven or Hell. Sure, sometimes I feel a person doesn't deserve to live, for a little while, but when I'm honest with myself, I believe that there are no good and bad people. Some are lucky to have been in a good environment, while others were unlucky and were in a bad environment.
That said, I believe God's plan is to save as many as possible, before mankind destroys the rest. God will not launch the nukes. God loves us. Mankind will launch the nukes. As Jesus said, "Judge not, lest ye be judged". He was speaking to mankind, as well as individuals. That is why the end is called "Judgment Day".
If it happens, it'll be the end of an era, not the end of mankind. It'll be a wonderful new era, with World Peace and no poverty, no Global Warming, plenty of abundance for all.
It'd be great if we could enter this new era without war, but only God knows all those details of God's plans.
Here's what I believe God's plan is conceivia.com
Tony