2008 U.S. Elections results and aftermath

topic posted Thu, February 28, 2008 - 5:53 PM by  offlineKEVIN
www.youtube.com/watch

Our shadow overlords were exposed by a mistake at Diebold who released the name of the next president. As it's McCain and he's a Republican, will this be good or bad for drug laws and the War on Drugs?
posted by:
KEVIN
Los Angeles
  • Re: 2008 U.S. Elections results and aftermath

    Thu, February 28, 2008 - 5:56 PM
    Both
    Bad, cos he'll be into punishment at the expense of treatment ( that's my guess; I have not researched his position)
    Good, cos he's gonna let all the mexicans in, and they have all the dope, lol.
    • Re: 2008 U.S. Elections results and aftermath

      Thu, February 28, 2008 - 7:16 PM
      I wonder about it. Have you ever noticed that what a politician does once elected is almost always what his opponent has been promising to do?
      Bill Clinton wins, we get a balanced budget, Don't ask don't tell, paying down the national debt. mostly peaceful times, a rising stock market, NAFTA, and a few things I've forgotten.
      You'd think the Republicans would've been happy with Bill, but all they do is bitch about him and Monica.

      Bush Junior takes office and wow! The largest increase in federal spending ever, even larger than Reagan! Oh yeah, another small governmanet politicain ol' Reagan! Just who's selling this stuff to us, anyway? Jr. has three wars going, plus the ongoing War on Drugs, A great increase in the intrusiveness of the federal government and it's powers, hell just his attitude towards warrantless phone tapping is enough to scare me. And which Republican president signed into law the creation of the Department of Education? A federal bureaucracy that has yet to educate one child, but has seen its budget balloon to something huge I'm sure.

      So maybe if McCain wins we'll have legal herion in three years? Nah, not a chance, but maybe Hemp and Pot can atleast come to their senses. Junior Bush sure meddled with Mexican politics when the previous president Vincent Fox suggested he might sign the bill legalizing small personal amounts of drugs. What a panic that must've been for the DEA and the Narco-Nazi.
      • Re: 2008 U.S. Elections results and aftermath

        Sun, March 2, 2008 - 5:38 AM
        Yeah, I dunno why they bitch about monica, when they themselves (republicans) are hiring gay hookers, sucking cock in bathrooms, etc. I think, as the President of the most powerful country in the free world, the president has the right, nay, the duty, to recieve blowjobs in office, lol. IMHO.
        • Re: 2008 U.S. Elections results and aftermath

          Tue, April 29, 2008 - 8:45 PM
          It turns out that I was wrong about a which party had presidency when the Department of Education was put into law. Jimmy Carter was.
          • Re: 2008 U.S. Elections results and aftermath

            Wed, April 30, 2008 - 4:56 AM
            HAHA

            I remember being a kid when bill clinton got a bj in the oval office
            and I remember this image of american marriage, happiness
            just shatter haha
            everyone was so offended and was like get the fuck out of here you pig!
            At least from my perspective, which was so limited.

            our president is such a disgusting freak.
            how can they seriously be this fucking ridiculous.
            The earth needs to eat these bastards.
            Because all humans are off limits to these liars; conductors of evil.

            is gasoline a drug?
            why exactly does it just keep escalating in price?
            how much does it cost in china?


            • Re: 2008 U.S. Elections results and aftermath

              Wed, April 30, 2008 - 4:57 AM
              I think it's kind of funny how $$$ gas is getting, no offense y'all.
              soon,
              no one will be able to deny
              • I was told a couple of days ago that Monica Lewinski was switching parties to the Republican Party. Apparently the Democrats left a bad taste in her mouth...
                • This is one of those things that pisses me off more than anything about our society – if you give someone a blowjob, once, you're famous for life.

                  You don't even have to be good at it. You don't have to get it on film, but it helps.

                  "I want to be an actress." "Let's make a sex tape." 'Hey, wanna be in my movie?"

                  WTF?
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
                    It's a disgrace to professsional sluts and whores everywhere. What about that little slut who got busted fucking the NY Govoner? Now she's gonna be a millionaire, and he resigns in disgrace. How is that fair? WTF does that have to do with his ability to govern? Granted, his wife would probably rightfully divorce him, still yet.
                    American have these disgustingly puritanical views on sex and drugs. I don't care if a man wants to get fucked in the ass by a troop of meth- crazed baboons in rubber underwear, while donning a nuns habit and singing the theme song to Dr. Doolittle( I have never done this, lol?) He's not hurting anyone so it ought to be his business. He does, however, deserve to be clowned mercilously.
                    • Re: 2008 U.S. Elections results and aftermath

                      Fri, May 2, 2008 - 10:00 PM
                      Women like to bitch and moan about the "Double standard," but it seems to me they're the ones who have the most to gain by being public whores.

                      The men lose their jobs and credibility, but the women get to be famous forever. (Paris Hilton)

                      This is being said by a feminist, mind you.
  • Re: 2008 U.S. Elections results and aftermath

    Mon, May 5, 2008 - 12:51 AM
    Nice. that was funny as hell. Its true that the election are staged. At least unless all of the candites are already with them. O'bama will never win because he is a decent person. Hillary and McCain are evil so one of them will win.
    • Those Onion investigative reporters are amazing in what they can dig up! I was just commenting on that in a different tribe after someone there posted an article about the government's plans to help paranoid schizophreniacs.
      www.theonion.com/content/v...government

      Of the three front runners, I think I'd rather have Obama. He didn't go along with gas tax shell game and spoke against it.

      Do you think he'd do anything about the War on Drugs? More prisons or maybe decriminalization? Or nothing, just let things continue as they are? Has he done anything on it, or been asked recently? He's from Illinois, right? A state that has recently criminalized salvia divinorum for some ridiculous reason. Oh yeah, I remember now. It helps politicians get re-elected if the look tough on drugs and crime, especially if it appears that they're also protecting children while doing so. This despite the fact that the War on Drugs has done more harm to more children and adults than all the drugs being fought in the war.
      • Illinois is a ridiculous state, and a great portion of the politicians are corrupt. I can say this having lived my entire life in Illinois. A couple months back I even started a new thread here about the ridiculous non-discussion our state government had about medical marijuana. They would never put something like this on a ballot for the people of the state to decide, because then something might get done.

        From the little I know, since it's not the main topic on anyone's platform, Obama has said nothing and done nothing to indicate he would do anything to change what the US is currently doing about drugs. He seems to be more to the left on the issue than Hillary is, I think, but not nearly as far as Kucinich, of course.

        Though being a sensible man, and a black man nonetheless, I think there is a chance he would at least discuss something in intelligent terms, hear the other side before weighing in. In his history in the Illinois state government, he was never one to just rubber stamp something that everyone else was agreeing with. He still had his own thoughts and opinions and would vote what he thought was best. of course, at the time, we were a very heavily Republican state…

Recent topics in "The War on Drugs"